2%) of 45 patient RS-NP eyes and 7 (25%) of the 28 HC eyes as progressing. Post-hoc analysis identified three reasons (segmentation, centring, and local damage) for these errors.
Global metrics lead to FPs and FNs because of problems inherent in OCT scanning (segmentation and centring), and to FNs because they can miss local damage. These problems are difficult, if not impossible, to correct, and raise concerns about the advisability of using G
and G
for detecting progression.
Global metrics lead to FPs and FNs because of problems inherent in OCT scanning (segmentation and centring), and to FNs because they can miss local damage. These problems are difficult, if not impossible, to correct, and raise concerns about the advisability of using GONH and Gmac for detecting progression.
To compare the efficacy of topical 0.03% tacrolimus in combination with systemic corticosteroids versus systemic mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids in preventing corneal allograft rejection after repeat keratoplasty.
This prospective, randomized clinical trial enrolled 63 consecutive eyes of 63 patients who underwent repeat keratoplasty after a failed penetrating keratoplasty. Group 1 (32 eyes) received MMF orally 1 g twice daily for the first 6 months and then 1 g daily for the next 6 months, and group 2 (31 eyes) received topical 0.03% tacrolimus four times a day for 12 months. All patients were treated with topical and oral corticosteroids postoperatively. The participants were observed closely for signs of graft rejection, and the rates of rejection-free graft survival were calculated and compared between the two groups at postoperative month 12.
The groups were balanced in patient's age and risk factors for graft rejection (e.g., original diagnosis, number of previous grafts, and quadrants of corneal vascularization). Endothelial graft rejection occurred in 5 eyes (15.6%) of group 1 and 6 eyes (19.4%) of group 2 (P = 0.75). Irreversible endothelial graft rejection resulting in graft failure occurred in 3 eyes of each group (P = 0.99). The rate of rejection-free graft survival was 84.4% in group 1 and 80.6% in group 2 at postoperative month 12 (P = 0.74).
Topical 0.03% tacrolimus was as effective as systemic MMF as adjuncts to topical and systemic corticosteroids in reducing endothelial graft rejection with 12 months follow up after repeat keratoplasty.
Topical 0.03% tacrolimus was as effective as systemic MMF as adjuncts to topical and systemic corticosteroids in reducing endothelial graft rejection with 12 months follow up after repeat keratoplasty.
Patients undergoing intravitreal injections for nAMD are often anxious about early detection of nAMD in their fellow eyes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a home-based telephone method for helping patients to monitor for symptoms of second eye involvement.
Using a five-staged evaluation tool, telephone-assisted evaluations were repeatedly performed on the patients' fellow eyes every 4 weeks for 1 year. A decision on presence or absence of nAMD was made after each telephone evaluation. Slitlamp examination and OCT scan were performed at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months or whenever nAMD was suspected from the telephone evaluation. The sensitivity and specificity values were calculated from the true and false positive and negative rates of each of the five composite stages.
In total, 514 telephone episodes comprising 2570 evaluations were conducted on fellow eyes of 50 patients over one year. Three patients (6%) developed nAMD in fellow eyes. The sensitivity of all of the stages was low (33.3%). The specificity of the five stages ranged from 91.3% to 98.6%. The highest specificity was achieved by the near acuity component of the tool.
We were unable to demonstrate a high sensitivity for the five-staged tool but the near acuity component of this tool had a very high specificity. This could have potential for "ruling out" nAMD and reducing the burden of false positive episodes for a large group of patients who are at risk of developing nAMD in their second eyes.
We were unable to demonstrate a high sensitivity for the five-staged tool but the near acuity component of this tool had a very high specificity. This could have potential for "ruling out" nAMD and reducing the burden of false positive episodes for a large group of patients who are at risk of developing nAMD in their second eyes.
Home monitoring of hyperacuity allows early detection of progression in exudative neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). However, false alarms may pose a significant burden to both patients and healthcare professionals alike.
To assess the false alarm rate and positive predictive value of smartphone-based home monitoring of nvAMD and DMO.
Patients treated with anti-angiogenic therapy in a pro re nata scheme for nvAMD or DMO at the Medical Retina service (Lucerne, Switzerland) between March and June 2016 were included in this prospective cohort study. check details The home monitoring test Alleye (Oculocare Ltd, Switzerland) provided a session score from 0-100 in addition to a traffic-light system feedback via the smartphone application. Three consecutive "red" scores were considered as a positive test or alarm signal. Specificity, 1-specificity (false alarm rate) and the predictive value for optical coherence tomography-based disease progression were analysed.
73 eyes of 56 patients performed 2258 tests in 222 "follow-up periods". Progression was observed in 141 periods (63.5%). The specificity of the test was 93.8% (95% CI 86.2-98.0%), the false alarm rate 6.1% (95% CI 2.0-13.8%), and the positive predictive value 80.0% (95% CI 59.3-93.2%) for the detection of progression.
False alarm rates for the detection of progression in macular disease via home monitoring is low. These findings suggest that home monitoring may be a useful adjunct for remote management of nvAMD and DMO.
False alarm rates for the detection of progression in macular disease via home monitoring is low. These findings suggest that home monitoring may be a useful adjunct for remote management of nvAMD and DMO.