What are edit checks? Explained in clinical research courses
Edit checks are a great mechanism to improve data quality within an electronic data capture (EDC) system. Pharmacovigilance courses would tell one about this specific concept. The reason it is used that there are many advantages creating them in electronic case report forms (eCRFs) These include real-time feedback for site staff in data entry, early resolution of data discrepancies, and automated review, allowing monitors and data managers to focus on more complex review tasks. These are all covered in clinical research courses.
Why are the edit checks essential to the program?
There is a possibility that there may be an unending list of potential edit checks. Clinical research courses may tell you about the possibilities in this case. Yet, these may be unlikely and possibly will require development and testing. In most situations, there will be standard or protocol-specific edit checks. One can know about this from clinical research courses.
What are the Standard Edit Checks? According to clinical research courses
Here’s what people have to do with respect to standard edit checks to various programs. They have to check if you’re able to program 10 standard checks into a form template, test the form, and reuse the form on most protocols. In result, one would get a lot for your initial investment of time and testing. One could also term a standard library of form templates and edit checks addressing common data entry errors via standard checks and applied to most studies. Learn about this concept in PG Diploma in Clinical Research.
What are the Protocol-Specific Edit Checks?
In some situations, there would be occurrences when it makes sense to add protocol-specific checks, particularly for critical data points and unique protocol procedures. Clinical research courses would tell one about when these instances arise and when it comes to these checks. There may be Protocol eligibility criteria in certain cases, but it varies from protocol to protocol and may need to be made as protocol-specific checks. Moreover, assessments for primary endpoint analysis are key to the success of the protocol, differ from protocol to protocol, and get advantage from additional checks to ensure the highest level of quality.